break a record

more than 38 people need to agree to be online at a certain time to break the Most Online Ever record

you realize that was set by a bunch of archive.is bots when i went through and archived all of OTXT, right? it isnt happening

well were gonna make it happen

unless youre not a team player

shut the fuck up no one is going to do this retarded bullshit

Ugly wrote:shut the fuck up no one is going to do this retarded bullshit

somebody needs to change his diaper it seems

tomoko why do you even try to make people salty

op is gay

tomoko should make a skype

flademcgay wrote:tomoko should make a skype

ill bet if we watched a movie with her she would talk all the way through to try to make us mad

oaky wrote:

flademcgay wrote:tomoko should make a skype

ill bet if we watched a movie with her she would talk all the way through to try to make us mad

i bet she would try to

she would try to

put me in the

why do you guys keep on thinking that im trying to get you mad

im not

you guys are getting mad for no reason

like, for real, im trying to engage in a thread that has no other meanings

theres nothing else to talk about, i just figured to myself "wow 38 is a lot of people"

so please, stop finding ways to feel offended

tomoko-chan wrote:like, for real, im trying to engage in a thread that has no other meanings

theres nothing else to talk about, i just figured to myself "wow 38 is a lot of people"

so please, stop finding ways to feel offended

youre not making us mad but when you try to start shit its so obvious because its so fake

im not starting shit

im making a thread about how the forum tells you the most users online ever, and how it should be broken

how does that provoke anyone?

i dont think he means it that way

tomoko-chan wrote:im not starting shit

im making a thread about how the forum tells you the most users online ever, and how it should be broken

how does that provoke anyone?

this specific thread of course does not apply to what he is saying but when you say that it would be ok to travel to north korea its a bit hard for people to take you seriously, keeping in mind that north korea has threatened the US and this is a forum full of american patriots including myself

flademcgay wrote:

tomoko-chan wrote:im not starting shit

im making a thread about how the forum tells you the most users online ever, and how it should be broken

how does that provoke anyone?

this specific thread of course does not apply to what he is saying but when you say that it would be ok to travel to north korea its a bit hard for people to take you seriously, keeping in mind that north korea has threatened the US and this is a forum full of american patriots including myself

how does asking for opinions on travel to north korea provoke anything as well?

im really interested in "extreme travel". my argument is that as long as i dont take unauthorized photos or say anything anti-government, then i wont be in danger as american tourists have gone to north korea (ex. koryo tours) and made it out safe. they want to pander to americans and "show" them that everyone is wrong about north korea, which is fine by me because i just want to travel to say that i went to north korea

the counter argument is that im an american and im at risk. north korea does not restrict tourism, they only monitor it very closely, which is fine by me

tomoko-chan wrote:

flademcgay wrote:

tomoko-chan wrote:im not starting shit

im making a thread about how the forum tells you the most users online ever, and how it should be broken

how does that provoke anyone?

this specific thread of course does not apply to what he is saying but when you say that it would be ok to travel to north korea its a bit hard for people to take you seriously, keeping in mind that north korea has threatened the US and this is a forum full of american patriots including myself

how does asking for opinions on travel to north korea provoke anything as well?

im really interested in "extreme travel". my argument is that as long as i dont take unauthorized photos or say anything anti-government, then i wont be in danger as american tourists have gone to north korea (ex. koryo tours) and made it out safe. they want to pander to americans and "show" them that everyone is wrong about north korea, which is fine by me because i just want to travel to say that i went to north korea

the counter argument is that im an american and im at risk. north korea does not restrict tourism, they only monitor it very closely, which is fine by me

but youre clearly full of shit, nobody goes to a place because they want to say theyve been there, they go to a place because its interesting to them. you don't speak even a little bit of korean, tomoko, how are you going to be able to do anything

you are literally saying this just to be edgy

flademcgay wrote:

tomoko-chan wrote:

flademcgay wrote:

tomoko-chan wrote:im not starting shit

im making a thread about how the forum tells you the most users online ever, and how it should be broken

how does that provoke anyone?

this specific thread of course does not apply to what he is saying but when you say that it would be ok to travel to north korea its a bit hard for people to take you seriously, keeping in mind that north korea has threatened the US and this is a forum full of american patriots including myself

how does asking for opinions on travel to north korea provoke anything as well?

im really interested in "extreme travel". my argument is that as long as i dont take unauthorized photos or say anything anti-government, then i wont be in danger as american tourists have gone to north korea (ex. koryo tours) and made it out safe. they want to pander to americans and "show" them that everyone is wrong about north korea, which is fine by me because i just want to travel to say that i went to north korea

the counter argument is that im an american and im at risk. north korea does not restrict tourism, they only monitor it very closely, which is fine by me

but youre clearly full of shit, nobody goes to a place because they want to say theyve been there, they go to a place because its interesting to them. you don't speak even a little bit of korean, tomoko, how are you going to be able to do anything

it does call my interest, so fuck off with that "b-b-b-but *EXCUSE*" bullshit

so what if i dont speak korean? so if you dont speak any language other than english, that means you cant travel outside of the anglo-sphere? so fuck off with that language barrier thing, because thats always going to be an issue in tourism, solved by having a guide or a pocket-translating book

you have a very narrow-minded and ignorant view of how tourism works. not a shocker though

flademcgay wrote:you are literally saying this just to be edgy

go be a bitch about something else

if traveling to such nations interests me, ill ask for opinions to have a discussion about it. but if you want to call that interest "Edgy", for no reason other than "ITS NOT A SAFE PLACE" (which i have acknowledged and justified), and then try to start shit over it, then dont cry when i call you out

you are making yourself mad, with your little self-victimization complex, and trying to cherrypick things out of nothing to have an excuse to get angry and butthurt

nigga what flade is absolutely on the spot

viubladan wrote:nigga what flade is absolutely on the spot

no he isnt, im not surprised you side with him because you are absolutely wrong as well

what about travelling makes it so edgy? yeah, its not a safe place to be if youre a westerner, but i covered that aspect while all you do is keep on trying to find some sort of shock value in what i say

it's not the travel that's edgy it's the fact that you actually want to travel to north korea when there is zero reason to

one day tomokos gonna be stuck in a north korean labor camp thinking about this very argument and asking herself why she didnt just listen to rt and flade