where should we build the first space colony

better dead than not red, i always say

Flamcastro wrote:better dead than not red, i always say

oh well then thanks for simplifying the process of making the world not shit by allowing the world to transition to a truly global capitalist society

ror @ clintonian borderless globalist capitalist agenda

Flamcastro wrote:ror @ clintonian borderless globalist capitalist agenda

i'm sorry i don't speak pure buzzwordese

i'm referring to a leaked file where hillary clinton literally said something along the lines of "my dream is a world with global free trade and no borders" which is a hilariously utopian idea that would only make the global elite richer as it stands, each country would have to be developed to its full potential first for say africa to stand a chance and we'd still have most of the problems we have now as far as wage issues and inflation and stuff go because capitalism is shit

oh you're referring to that out of context email where she was talking about trade or whatever nice job FD

pretty sure it was a speech and you can look it up if you fucking want it's not out of context and my point still stands

Flamcastro wrote:pretty sure it was a speech and you can look it up if you fucking want it's not out of context and my point still stands

it definitely was out of context i distinctly remember the context and it was about trade

fd said as he anxiously waited for 3d printers to start the third industrial revolution, moving the means of production to the oppressed working class while american robots do work in the background

Flamcastro wrote:clintonian borderless globalist capitalist agenda

is this dude serious

soundin like alex jones

porter ricer pulverizer wrote:soundin like alex jones

folks t-t-t-t-t-t-the globalists people f-f-folks folks people the g-globalists people

FUDGIEFIGHTERIA wrote:

Flamcastro wrote:pretty sure it was a speech and you can look it up if you fucking want it's not out of context and my point still stands

it definitely was out of context i distinctly remember the context and it was about trade

exactly it was about trade so was my statement because capitalism is trade

oaky wrote:fd said as he anxiously waited for 3d printers to start the third industrial revolution, moving the means of production to the oppressed working class while american robots do work in the background

you got me i do believe this kind of thing can happen

clinton wants the flood gates to be more open than they already are
what next do we let in rapacious mudslime scum

Flamcastro wrote:

oaky wrote:fd said as he anxiously waited for 3d printers to start the third industrial revolution, moving the means of production to the oppressed working class while american robots do work in the background

you got me i do believe this kind of thing can happen

i hope youre joking

Congo Jack wrote:clinton wants the flood gates to be more open than they already are
what next do we let in rapacious mudslime scum

yes

oaky wrote:

Flamcastro wrote:

oaky wrote:fd said as he anxiously waited for 3d printers to start the third industrial revolution, moving the means of production to the oppressed working class while american robots do work in the background

you got me i do believe this kind of thing can happen

i hope youre joking

why do you have a kneejerk reaction to any sort of observation about the end of technological progress

Flamcastro wrote:

Congo Jack wrote:clinton wants the flood gates to be more open than they already are
what next do we let in rapacious mudslime scum

yes

oaky wrote:

Flamcastro wrote:

oaky wrote:fd said as he anxiously waited for 3d printers to start the third industrial revolution, moving the means of production to the oppressed working class while american robots do work in the background

you got me i do believe this kind of thing can happen

i hope youre joking

why do you have a kneejerk reaction to any sort of observation about the end of technological progress

>le meme arrows when he actually thinks "technological progress" will end
here's a little newsflash: so long as life exists on this big blue rock and throughout the cosmos there will always be a need to improve our technology

you will live and die long before any sort of "technological progress" ceases and long before any hypothetical workers' revolution which results

also lol he actually thinks the big companies won't just bully the little indie 3D printers out of existence

FUDGIEFIGHTERIA wrote:

Flamcastro wrote:

Congo Jack wrote:clinton wants the flood gates to be more open than they already are
what next do we let in rapacious mudslime scum

yes

oaky wrote:

Flamcastro wrote:

oaky wrote:fd said as he anxiously waited for 3d printers to start the third industrial revolution, moving the means of production to the oppressed working class while american robots do work in the background

you got me i do believe this kind of thing can happen

i hope youre joking

why do you have a kneejerk reaction to any sort of observation about the end of technological progress

>le meme arrows when he actually thinks "technological progress" will end
here's a little newsflash: so long as life exists on this big blue rock and throughout the cosmos there will always be a need to improve our technology

you will live and die long before any sort of "technological progress" ceases and long before any hypothetical workers' revolution which results

LOL obviously technological progress won't entirely end things will get streamlined and changed around but eventually there won't be any more breakthroughs

FUDGIEFIGHTERIA wrote:also lol he actually thinks the big companies won't just bully the little indie 3D printers out of existence

i'm actually not counting on 3d printers because i get progress is slow and they'll be expensive for a while i just see that as what the world will be like a thousand years from now.
what does that have to do with anything anyway? it has nothing to do with big business, all the printers could be made by the same company and you'd still have the same result. plus you'll be able to print printers as soon as these printers can print complex circuits and then all of them are fucked

Flamcastro wrote:
LOL obviously technological progress won't entirely end things will get streamlined and changed around but eventually there won't be any more breakthroughs

humanity will probably cease to exist long before this happens because every new discovery opens a new door of things we don't know about

i'm actually not counting on 3d printers because i get progress is slow and they'll be expensive for a while i just see that as what the world will be like a thousand years from now.

what does that have to do with anything anyway? it has nothing to do with big business, all the printers could be made by the same company and you'd still have the same result. plus you'll be able to print printers as soon as these printers can print complex circuits and then all of them are fucked

do you really think they haven't already thought of this lol

FUDGIEFIGHTERIA wrote:

Flamcastro wrote:
LOL obviously technological progress won't entirely end things will get streamlined and changed around but eventually there won't be any more breakthroughs

humanity will probably cease to exist long before this happens because every new discovery opens a new door of things we don't know about

i'm actually not counting on 3d printers because i get progress is slow and they'll be expensive for a while i just see that as what the world will be like a thousand years from now.

what does that have to do with anything anyway? it has nothing to do with big business, all the printers could be made by the same company and you'd still have the same result. plus you'll be able to print printers as soon as these printers can print complex circuits and then all of them are fucked

do you really think they haven't already thought of this lol

discoveries already ended a while ago with the development of m-theory and relativity

what can they do about it?

lol no they didn't you're just kinda dumb

nod an argumend

Flamcastro wrote:nod an argumend

"discoveries already ended a while ago with the development of m-theory and relativity" needs no argument it stands alone in its stupidity

no it doesn't lol all engineering feats from here on out will derive from what we already know about the way things work because we stopped learning about the way things work a while ago