fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
+9
Mac B
appernitce
salty
the 4th disciple
alyaza
him
James
cya
flamination
13 posters
Page 3 of 4
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
FD is apparently unaware that even if he got the wiki taken down (which wouldn't happen), it could easily be rehosted on a third-level domain such as say .tk or .uk where US law does not have jurisdictionflamination wrote:and i'll just take it down over there too- illegal content is illegal content is illegal content
you don't know enough to think of me as a bad person yet you still hop on the "dae le fuck fd???" bandwagon as soon as it shows up
it was a while back so maybe i'm confused about the account shit
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
lol i seriously doubt that even the states involved would give a shitMac B wrote:fd fails to realize even if this bs really was illegal in this case, it wouldn't be enforced, and if it was, afilliated parties (primarily RTC) would get off with a slap on the wrist because holy shit! he's a minor too!
a minor telling another minor his name without prompt then the second party using that info for a small community-based article that most likely no one outside of said community will read, and even if did would pose little if any threat with given info is totally illegal, guys!
colorado has waaaaaay better things to do than pursue a case against a 15 year old kid who hosts the info dump for a forum community of about 15 people and i'm pretty sure that texas is too busy prepping a case against the supreme court right now regarding gay marriage
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
tejas also has no jurisdiction in colorado so i'm pretty sure they'd have to go through one of the higher courts to pursue this if they really wanted to not that they'd have a case against any of this to begin with
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
i like how FD always has to bitch about it being MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEoaky wrote:yeah bro it totally wasnt because nobody likes youflamination wrote:and i'm bored so i feel like rt straight up saying (not even admitting) he was 100% responsible for getting me kicked from otbathhouse is more proof he's literally out to destroy anything that makes me happy or feel good
i was responsible for the crusade against him but it was pretty clear that nobody liked him anyways and that they were only milking him for posts on OTBH and in any case posting furry porn like he did is against the FM ToS so ya
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
petition to get fd banned from forumotion forever
Mac B- CASIO MT220
- Posts : 6185
volume of testosterone : 213331
Join date : 2015-04-20
Age : 160
Location : sweet baby rays
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
fd is the beaner captaion of isues
Mac B- CASIO MT220
- Posts : 6185
volume of testosterone : 213331
Join date : 2015-04-20
Age : 160
Location : sweet baby rays
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
its not enforced at the federal level (he literally just made that up to make him sound more authorative) according to the article he linked its only applicable in a few states and in the state he lives in it only applies when the three conditions are met:
In Texas, in order to recover for public disclosure of private facts, a plaintiff must show that (1) publicity was given to matters concerning his or her private life; (2) the publication of these facts would be highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities; and (3) the matter publicized was not of legitimate public concern.
In Texas, in order to recover for public disclosure of private facts, a plaintiff must show that (1) publicity was given to matters concerning his or her private life; (2) the publication of these facts would be highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities; and (3) the matter publicized was not of legitimate public concern.
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
also from the article
A plaintiff must establish four elements to hold someone liable for publication of private facts:
1. Public Disclosure: The disclosure of facts must be public. Another way of saying this is that the defendant must "give publicity" to the fact or facts in question.
2. Private Fact: The fact or facts disclosed must be private, and not generally known.
3. Offensive to a Reasonable Person: Publication of the private facts in question must be offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities.
4. Not Newsworthy: The facts disclosed must not be newsworthy. Stated differently, the facts disclosed must not be a matter of legitimate public concern.
A plaintiff must establish four elements to hold someone liable for publication of private facts:
1. Public Disclosure: The disclosure of facts must be public. Another way of saying this is that the defendant must "give publicity" to the fact or facts in question.
2. Private Fact: The fact or facts disclosed must be private, and not generally known.
3. Offensive to a Reasonable Person: Publication of the private facts in question must be offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities.
4. Not Newsworthy: The facts disclosed must not be newsworthy. Stated differently, the facts disclosed must not be a matter of legitimate public concern.
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
i don't think he can even get me charged in his fucking state just because of the "the publication of these facts would be highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities" clause then
his name, city of residence and picture are not "highly offensive" and neither are the publication of his implied fetishes and shitty actions
his name, city of residence and picture are not "highly offensive" and neither are the publication of his implied fetishes and shitty actions
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
and beside that, how the fuck do you prove that something "would be highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities?"
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
OP says he is not gay vore loving furry but this image by link proves otherwise
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
all that stuff you said about me on ottd
hurts man
you realize that I wouldn't even be into vore if it weren't for people joking that I was because of my username (??? pervs) and then me searching it up andddd yeah
and I explicitly said that mlp vore was stoopid and whenever people say that on OT- they're just kidding
i'm not saying we have to be friends but something tells me you were just saying that because it would be something that ammy would like to hear, we used to be cool on rot back in like 2012 remember
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
never forget the time FD attempted to impersonate amsk8r and got found out immediately
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
scumbag FD
>accuses OTTD users of impersonating him, therefore "breaking the law"
>has impersonated at least five OTTD or OTx users (ROOM, dandelion, amsk8r, zacmac, dogman) before
>accuses OTTD users of impersonating him, therefore "breaking the law"
>has impersonated at least five OTTD or OTx users (ROOM, dandelion, amsk8r, zacmac, dogman) before
toby- Toby
- Posts : 5899
volume of testosterone : 117621
Join date : 2014-09-15
Age : 53
Location : toby
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
this is funnier to me than it should besamoyed wrote:memes
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
"the real amsk8r doesn't play sword fight tournament" -Jesus
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
lol nothing but damage control that sucks cocks try again faggot
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
flaming "INFORMATION I RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC IS PRIVATE INFORMATION!!!!!!!!!! I'M GOING TO SUE YOU FUCKING OTTD ADHUFasHKASDFJLSjl;asfj;;J;jJ;fj;aFJL;AFJ;FA;jaj;asdfj;asfj;asdfj;asfj; fuck yoouuuuuuuuuuuuuaxjl fsjlafsajl fl;afjlsadfsk;a" dinner
Re: fd containtment thread also known as my article is literally illegal
you understand that all of this is going back on your wiki page correct
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» flamingdinner's antics are most likely illegal: the thread (alyaza admits to doxing zilchexo: the thread)
» SHOULD IT BE ILLEGAL FOR TOMOKO TO POST ABOUT ROBLOX
» this just in: not hiding people's identities in post screencaps is illegal!!!
» rd101 is literally me but more gay
» h3h3 productions is literally jesus christ
» SHOULD IT BE ILLEGAL FOR TOMOKO TO POST ABOUT ROBLOX
» this just in: not hiding people's identities in post screencaps is illegal!!!
» rd101 is literally me but more gay
» h3h3 productions is literally jesus christ
Page 3 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|